Skip to main content

Philosophy Thesis: Radical Enlightenment and the French Revolution

BRLSI Tuesday 23rd June 2015
Jonathan Israel of Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton
Notes by William Gaskell
Henry May 1976 book “American Enlightenment” first coined the term “Radical Enlightenment” which propagated the view of a democratic republic with no black slavery.
Vermont which was the 14th US state (wasn’t recognised as a state when the original 13 colonies declared independence) was the 1st US state to abolish slavery.
Then Pennsylvania, which had a sizeable black slave population, was the first major state to abolish the practice.

Spinoza, 17th century philosopher influenced Strauss who was a moderate philosopher and encouraged deference to religious and ecclesiastical authorities.
Liberation from these authorities became possible because of Spinoza’s writings.
Strauss did not agree with Spinoza’s atheism but remained moderate.
Idiosyncrasy of religion is that it was used by political leaders to propagate their power – like King Herod I suppose!

Pre-revolution France was a society based on privilege with ancient rights, 3 estates:
1.       Aristocrats
2.       clergy
3.       judiciary
Peter De Bola wrote an interesting piece on rights in the 18th century recently which is interesting as he thinks different groups intrinsically have different inherent rights, slaves, aristocrats, gentry etc.
·         Radical Enlightenment (Voltaire) believes in 1 set of rules to govern the whole republic’s reality.
·         Moderate Enlightenment (Locke) concedes to a multitude of different schemes to explain reality:
1.       Scientific
2.       Supernatural/spiritual
3.       Etc
Rubbishing of king, clergy and aristocracy by socialists who say people are unhappy, in order to change people’s mindsets to suit their own philosophy of radical ideological values.
·         Thus rejecting 2 tier/3 class/multitudinal view system for the Republic.
Montesque’s religious tolerance from L’espirit des Lois (1748) [The spirit of laws]  was model for moderate enlightenment.
In early USA very limited suffrage was granted to population in the newly independent states – only wealthiest white males could vote.
9/10ths of French did not know what Republicanism was – in 1789
·         Newspaper editors then became Republicans
o   Can see the same thing happening today
Leading philosophers behind Radical Enlightenment:
Joseph Priestly
·         Leading “scientist” of his day
1789-92 press freedom in France was unprecedented
·         In US debate whether French Revolution was good/worth it/ideologically sound raged for a long time.
2 greatest Radical Enlighteners during 1780s and 1790s:
Nicolas de Cordorcet
·         February 1793 treatise revolutionary
·         Believed ultimately in equal rights for women and men of all races
·         One of the leaders of French revolution and also of Amis des Noirs
Thomas Jefferson
·         US Ambassador to France during French Revolution
Benjamin Franklin fell in with Thomas Paine and became a radical.
Franklin publication: La Science du Bonhomme Richard about French Revolution
LaFayette started as a Republican and became a moderate in 1792 and was forced out of prominence.
Robespierre propagates “spirit populaire” which is authority through communality and conformity by being ordinary.
All leading revolutions thinkers in France killed silenced after 1792.
·         30 leading editors killed in one go - to me reminiscent of the 30 tyrants of Athens.
Tom Paine sent to prison in France by the Terror and George Washington was happy to let him be imprisoned because of ideological differences and Paine wrote against Washington about the tough time he faced in prison in France.
Matthew Stewart’s recent book; Nature’s God, is about this dichotomy in philosophy.
The Enlightenment continues until 1815 and the Battle of Waterloo.
·         For example Joseph Bonaparte, Napoleon’s brother, as king of Spain abolished Spanish Inquisition etc
Napoleon allegedly attempted to respite slavery in Haiti as a French colony.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Camden Crescent and Hedgemead Park

Here are my thoughts: Did you know that Camden Crescent, originally Camden Place and Upper Camden Place (which is now round the corner) was named after the Earl of Camden, Charles Pratt, who was Chancellor of the Exchequer so sponsored the scheme with his symbol on every door and crest of the exchequer on the decoration at the centre of the crescent? Charles Pratt was actually lord of Camden Place in Chislehurst in Kent. He was mates with William Pitt the Elder from Eton and Cambridge days. It was built 1788-1792 by John Eveleigh the architect.  One third of the 22 house crescent collapsed during a landslip which claimed 136 houses on the slopes of Lansdown Hill leading to the creation of Hedgemead Park below Camden Crescent. John Eveleigh was notoriously bankrupted in Bath, being called to the coffee shop in the Bath Chronicle by his creditors. Earl Camden was famous for supporting Fox’s Libel Act of 1792 which said that libel should be tried as murder with a jury regarding the poin…

Housing Needs in House Search for Asperger’s Diagnosis

Essential requirements: ·Quiet away from traffic and flight path ·South facing windows for sunshine in the morning ·Triple glazing and proper A rated insulation ·Hedge and fence around property to block pollution A detached 2-bedroom property, 2 bathroom, 2 storey with attic and basement, study, dinning room, living room and kitchen with utility room, garage and small lawn all around property. Looking for something on a 10x10m plot with house on 8x8 m plan.

Things requested: ·Shower and a bath ·Air conditioning system with air filtration ·Tennis or squash court ·Swimming pool ·Vegetable garden ·Conservatory ·Solar panels ·UPS (uninterrupted power supply) device and battery backup ·22 foot high ceilings ·Detailed plastered finish ceiling ·Fireplace ·Security/blackout shutters ·Roof balcony

Criticism for the Tory Government in Britain

My criticism for Jacob Rees-Mogg and the Conservative Party would be from a financial perspective; the Tories have been poor on cost control and paying off stakeholders: extravagant wages and unpaid benefits bills. There have been no real compensation cases for human rights linked to the British education and qualifications system which is indicative of systemic failure at the grassroots. This means that there is a lack of opportunity for British people to do the work that they want to do; they are not being acknowledged. And a phoney social mobility scheme is propagating due to corporate culture being given precedence over British culture in public life.. I think the outlook could be negative for British finances with another credit rating downgrade for the UK, perhaps by two notches! My point is that it's the EU Pinkerton Agents getting the better of Tory government with Donald Tusk lording it over you from his office of power in the EU you won't get treated better in Europ…